US Government Controlled Clinical Evaluations of Chlorine Dioxide (CD)
(Done under controlled situation just like in regular drug trials)
A True Double Blind 12 Weeks Clinical Study With 60 Males Ages 21-35
The US Government has ALREADY conducted Double Blind Clinical Studies while Testing the ORAL Ingestion of Chlorine Dioxide. The Clinical Trial results were so amazing that they decided to have the FDA put the fear of God in the people so they would stay away from CD. This way the America people would NEVER know that they could use it to help their bodies recover from their many illnesses. Nope, they could not afford to mess with the Daddy Big Pharma profits.
So, for decades, our government conspired with big pharma to keep us all in the dark about the wonderful benefits of MMS/CD. The FDA is a lying fraudulent arm of big pharma, just as much as they are the government's big stick and medical propaganda producer.
Chlorine Dioxide was under serious consideration in the United States as an alternative to chlorine water treatment. Before chlorine dioxide was used routinely as a water disinfectant, the safety of oral human ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its by-products was assessed...but the results were not made public. In fact the FDA kept putting out fake warnings that it was unsafe. At the same time they began giving patents to their well connected friends from big companies to use Chlorine Dioxide in all sorts of human uses, without letting us know we were ingesting Chlorine Dioxide.
For this purpose, a controlled clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and chlorate was undertaken under the auspices of USEPA HERL #CR805643. The study was conducted in three parts.
So, for decades, our government conspired with big pharma to keep us all in the dark about the wonderful benefits of MMS/CD. The FDA is a lying fraudulent arm of big pharma, just as much as they are the government's big stick and medical propaganda producer.
Chlorine Dioxide was under serious consideration in the United States as an alternative to chlorine water treatment. Before chlorine dioxide was used routinely as a water disinfectant, the safety of oral human ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its by-products was assessed...but the results were not made public. In fact the FDA kept putting out fake warnings that it was unsafe. At the same time they began giving patents to their well connected friends from big companies to use Chlorine Dioxide in all sorts of human uses, without letting us know we were ingesting Chlorine Dioxide.
For this purpose, a controlled clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide, chlorite and chlorate was undertaken under the auspices of USEPA HERL #CR805643. The study was conducted in three parts.
- Phase I was designed to evaluate the acute physiological effects of progressively increasing doses of disinfectants administered to normal healthy adult males.
- Phase II was to study Chronic ingestion of Chlorine Dioxide by normal male volunteers.
- Phase III assessed the physiological response of a small group of potentially susceptible individuals, those deficient in glucose-6- phosphate dehydrogenase, to chronic ingestion of chlorite.
| clinical_test_results_of_chlorine_dioxide.pdf |
Controlled Clinical Trials of Chlorine Dioxide (CD) in Man
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/pdf/envhper00463-0059.pdf
Hiding this from the people since 1982. Now you can understand why they had the FDA go so hard after Jum Humble when he began to educate us about the use of CD. Thank God for showing Jim how to protect himself, the info and the protocols.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/pdf/envhper00463-0059.pdf
You may have to copy and paste the link so you can see the info.
Here's a Synopsis of What Happened During the Clinical Trials
The double blind clinical study was to assess the relative safety of chronically administered chlorine water disinfectants in man, a controlled study was undertaken. The clinical evaluation was conducted in the three phases common to investigational drug studies.
Phase I, a rising does tolerance investigation, examined the acute effects of progressively increasing single doses of chlorine disinfectants to normal healthy adult male volunteers.
Phase II considered the impact on normal subjects of daily ingestion of the disinfectants at a concentration of 5 mg/l. for twelve consecutive weeks. Persons with a low level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase may be expected to be especially susceptible to oxidative stress; therefore, in Phase III, chlorite at a concentration of 5 mg/l. was administered daily for twelve consecutive weeks to a small group of potentially at-risk glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient subjects.
Physiological impact was assessed by evaluation of a battery of qualitative and quantitative tests. The three phases of this controlled double-blind clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide and its potential metabolites in human male volunteer subjects were completed uneventfully.
There were no obvious undesirable clinical sequellae noted by any of the participating subjects or by the observing medical team.
In several cases, statistically significant trends in certain biochemical or physiological parameters were associated with treatment; however, none of these trends was judged to have physiological consequence.
(Meaning, they saw the participants got healed from various illnesses but don't want to document that)
One cannot rule out the possibility that, over a longer treatment period, these trends might indeed achieve proportions of clinical importance.
(Meaning, they saw the participants in the study record improved health and know that if they kept using Chlorine Dioxide, they'd be completely healed.)
However, by the absence of detrimental physiological responses within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated.
(Meaning, there were NO adverse reactions noted at all from oral ingestion of Chlorine Dioxide when used according to how Jim Humble recommends.)
This is one reason why they had the propaganda that MMS damage red blood cells. It doesn't. Their clinical trial proved that it healed those who have hemolytic anemia. The only used men for the double blind clinical trials. THEY TESTED IN 3 PHASES. The final phase was with men who suffered with Hemolytic Anemia.
Hemolytic Anemia is the most common medical problem associated with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, which occurs when red blood cells are destroyed faster than the body can replace them.
This type of anemia leads to paleness, yellowing of the skin and whites of the eyes (jaundice), dark urine, fatigue, shortness of breath, and a rapid heart rate. In people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, hemolytic anemia is most often triggered by bacterial or viral infections or by certain drugs (such as some antibiotics and medications used to treat malaria).
"Epidemiological studies (19,20) have failed to conclusively identify any significant exposure related effects. The clinical evaluation described in this report was an attempt to elucidate the effects of the chlorite, chlorine dioxide and chlorate in man under controlled clinical conditions.
During the course of the three-phase study, a massive volume of raw data was acquired. Routine urinalyses were performed and a meticulous examination of this body of information was made.
Their Clinical Conclusion:
No definitive finding of detrimental physiological impact was made in any of the three phases of this human investigation of the relative safety and tolerance of oral chlorine disinfectant ingestion.
In several cases, statistically significant trends were associated with treatment; however, none of these trends were judged to have immediate physiological consequence.
One cannot rule out the possibility that, over a longer treatment period, these trends might indeed achieve proportions of clinical importance.
However, within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated by the absence of detrimental physiological response."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/pdf/envhper00463-0059.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/pdf/envhper00463-0059.pdf
You may have to copy and paste the link so you can see the info.
Here's a Synopsis of What Happened During the Clinical Trials
The double blind clinical study was to assess the relative safety of chronically administered chlorine water disinfectants in man, a controlled study was undertaken. The clinical evaluation was conducted in the three phases common to investigational drug studies.
Phase I, a rising does tolerance investigation, examined the acute effects of progressively increasing single doses of chlorine disinfectants to normal healthy adult male volunteers.
Phase II considered the impact on normal subjects of daily ingestion of the disinfectants at a concentration of 5 mg/l. for twelve consecutive weeks. Persons with a low level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase may be expected to be especially susceptible to oxidative stress; therefore, in Phase III, chlorite at a concentration of 5 mg/l. was administered daily for twelve consecutive weeks to a small group of potentially at-risk glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient subjects.
Physiological impact was assessed by evaluation of a battery of qualitative and quantitative tests. The three phases of this controlled double-blind clinical evaluation of chlorine dioxide and its potential metabolites in human male volunteer subjects were completed uneventfully.
There were no obvious undesirable clinical sequellae noted by any of the participating subjects or by the observing medical team.
In several cases, statistically significant trends in certain biochemical or physiological parameters were associated with treatment; however, none of these trends was judged to have physiological consequence.
(Meaning, they saw the participants got healed from various illnesses but don't want to document that)
One cannot rule out the possibility that, over a longer treatment period, these trends might indeed achieve proportions of clinical importance.
(Meaning, they saw the participants in the study record improved health and know that if they kept using Chlorine Dioxide, they'd be completely healed.)
However, by the absence of detrimental physiological responses within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated.
(Meaning, there were NO adverse reactions noted at all from oral ingestion of Chlorine Dioxide when used according to how Jim Humble recommends.)
This is one reason why they had the propaganda that MMS damage red blood cells. It doesn't. Their clinical trial proved that it healed those who have hemolytic anemia. The only used men for the double blind clinical trials. THEY TESTED IN 3 PHASES. The final phase was with men who suffered with Hemolytic Anemia.
Hemolytic Anemia is the most common medical problem associated with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, which occurs when red blood cells are destroyed faster than the body can replace them.
This type of anemia leads to paleness, yellowing of the skin and whites of the eyes (jaundice), dark urine, fatigue, shortness of breath, and a rapid heart rate. In people with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, hemolytic anemia is most often triggered by bacterial or viral infections or by certain drugs (such as some antibiotics and medications used to treat malaria).
"Epidemiological studies (19,20) have failed to conclusively identify any significant exposure related effects. The clinical evaluation described in this report was an attempt to elucidate the effects of the chlorite, chlorine dioxide and chlorate in man under controlled clinical conditions.
During the course of the three-phase study, a massive volume of raw data was acquired. Routine urinalyses were performed and a meticulous examination of this body of information was made.
Their Clinical Conclusion:
No definitive finding of detrimental physiological impact was made in any of the three phases of this human investigation of the relative safety and tolerance of oral chlorine disinfectant ingestion.
In several cases, statistically significant trends were associated with treatment; however, none of these trends were judged to have immediate physiological consequence.
One cannot rule out the possibility that, over a longer treatment period, these trends might indeed achieve proportions of clinical importance.
However, within the limits of the study, the relative safety of oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide and its metabolites, chlorite and chlorate, was demonstrated by the absence of detrimental physiological response."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569027/pdf/envhper00463-0059.pdf
